Skip to main content

"There's Death in the Pot": Frederick Accum and food additives


Frederick Accum, an engraving by James Thomson
for European Magazine, 1820


Ever wonder what’s actually in the food you buy at the store? Do you scour food labels, straining to understand what ingredients like maltodextrin, diglycerides, carrageenan, thiamine mononitrate, or soy lecithin could possibly be?

It would take a chemist to sort out what's in the food we eat, and a chemist is exactly what Frederick Accum was. He was also one of the first people to recognize the need for regulations and standards when it came to additives in food processing.

Friedrich Christian Accum was born in Germany in 1769. He came from a family of soap-makers, and the family business gave him the opportunity to get an education and train as an apothecary, a professional much like a modern-day pharmacist.

In 1793 Accum emigrated to England to work with George Brande and his firm, who were apothecaries to the ailing King George III. In his new home, he Anglicized his first name to "Frederick," got married and started a family. By 1800 he’d established himself as a scientist and an entrepreneur, writing textbooks, teaching classes and giving public lectures. He also sold chemistry-related supplies and apparatuses and offered chemical analysis services.

"Chemical Lectures," by Thomas Rowlandson, early 1800s.
Critics agree the lecturer is probably Accum.

A scientist of wide-ranging interests, Accum also wrote well in the language of his adopted country. He researched the science behind gas lighting, and his book on this new technology, A Practical Treatise on Gas Light, was ground-breaking when it was published in 1815.

By 1820, though, Accum had turned his attention to food. He studied and wrote about the science involved in cooking, baking, and especially brewing. During this time, the population of Britain, especially in its cities, was rapidly growing. To meet the increasing demand, food was beginning to be processed and distributed by industry, using factories, instead of by farmers contacting consumers directly. 

Manufacturers soon learned that certain chemicals could make processed food look more appealing and boost profits, so they were trying out all sorts of untested additives. These spurious ingredients were added to improve the weight, taste or appearance of food.

Accum was one of the first to analyze these new food additives. He also found that there were very few checks on food manufacturers. Through chemical analysis, Accum discovered that much of the food being produced contained a variety of additives, some of them potentially lethal.

For example, Accum found that bakers were adding alum (aluminum potassium sulfate) to flour, red lead to Gloucester cheese to give it a nice color, and toxic salts derived from copper and lead to give candy brilliant hues.

Other adulterations Accum discovered included “wine” that was really just spoiled cider with additional color, dried blackthorn leaves being passed off as tea, and sulphuric acid added to vinegar to give it an added “zing.”





But it was his revelations about beer, a beverage that was widely consumed and a source of nutrition, that garnered the most attention. Accum’s chemical analysis showed that London brewers were doctoring their brews with iron sulfate, known as green vitriol, and aluminum potassium sulfate to give their beers a good head of foam, as well as Cocculus indicus, a poisonous extract, to give it a characteristic bitter taste.

Perhaps even more unforgivably, Accum’s studies showed that the beer that reached the public was somehow watered down – the alcohol content that registered 7.25 percent in the factory was really only 4.5 percent by the time the consumer got it.

Accum’s 1820 book, A Treatise on Adulterations of Food and Culinary Poisons, was a Regency best-seller, all copies sold within a month. Sales were undoubtedly boosted by the sensational cover illustration, which featured a fly trapped by a spider in a web, writhing snakes, and a skull and crossbones, topped off by a quotation from Bible [2 Kings 4:40]:  “There is death in the pot.”

Nobody loves a whistle-blower. Although sales were great, the book aroused the ire of food manufacturers and put a target on Accum’s back. He was arrested and charged with defacing books in the library of the Royal Institution (a pre-eminent London research and education center) and even though the case was eventually dismissed, Accum was publicly humiliated. He left England in 1821 and spent the rest of his life in Germany.

"There is death in the pot"- the ominous cover
of  Accum's Treatise, adorned with snakes
crawling up the borders and a spider in the center.


When Accum left England, the question of adulterated food conveniently went away, at least for a while. It briefly resurfaced when Parliament passed the Adulteration Act in 1860, but that act had no teeth and was pretty much unenforced.

It took the passage of two more acts, The Adulteration of Food Act in 1872 and the Sale of Food and Drugs Act in 1875 for processed food to regulated in Britain.


You could say that on this side of the pond, the Pure Food Act passed by Congress in 1906 owes a debt to the work of Frederick Accum, as well as the formation of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

So whether you buy a loaf of bread, open a box of candy or enjoy a glass of beer or wine this holiday season, you might want to propose a toast to Frederick Accum, one of the first scientists who cared about the health of people who ate processed food and tried to do something about it!


"Hip, hip, hurra!" Peder Severin Kroyer, 1888

Images courtesy of Pixabay and Wikimedia Commons

Sources for this post include:

 “Friedrich Christian Accum,” a chapter written by Rachel Laudan in Culinary Biographies: A Dictionary of the World's Great Historic Chefs, Cookbook Authors and Collectors, Farmers, Gourmets, Home Economists, Nutritionists, Restaurateurs, Philosophers, Physicians, Scientists, Writers, and Others Who Influenced the Way We Eat Today, edited by Alice Arndt, Yes Press Inc., Houston, Texas, 2006 








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Cato Street Conspiracy

Conspiracy and treason go hand in hand. Throughout history, conspirators have huddled in back rooms and dark corners in secret, concocting schemes that are both dangerous and illegal. So it’s no surprise that their plans often spiral out of control and end in disaster. 
A good example of a conspiracy plot gone wrong happened during the Regency. It’s been dubbed the Cato Street Conspiracy because of where the conspirators were caught. This is a tale that, according to historian J.B. Priestley (author of The Prince of Pleasure and his Regency) “begins in absurdity and ends in horror.”
The year was 1820. Though the Napoleonic Wars were over, Britain had paid a heavy price for its victory against the French. The costs of the war had strained the country’s economy. The working classes were hit hard by periods of famine, rising food prices due to the Corn Laws, and high unemployment, the latter driven by soldiers returning from the battlefields of Europe and looking for work. And of course, t…

The end of the Holy Roman Empire, or what happens when the Empire doesn't strike back

This is the way the world ends Not with a bang but a whimper
T.S. Eliot wasn't actually describing the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire when he wrote those words in his poem, “The Hollow Men.” Nonetheless, his words are an extremely apt way to describe the end of the Holy Roman Empire, which ended quietly with a stroke of a pen exactly 212 years ago in August of 1806. That’s when the last emperor decided it was his duty to abdicate, letting the ancient dominion under his protection dissolve rather than allow Napoleon to usurp the role of Holy Roman Emperor and everything that came with it. By that August the end of the empire had become inevitable. Napoleon’s victory over Russia and Austria at the Battle of Austerlitz in December of 1805 and his formation of the Confederation of the Rhine the following July (after he convinced 16 German princes to renounce their allegiance to the Holy Roman Empire and join him) were fatal blows. Throughout its thousand-year history, the Empire e…

At the drop of a hat: a history of headgear

“Cock your hat – angles are attitudes,” said Frank Sinatra. While I would never disagree with Ol’ Blue Eyes, because I believe that a hat set at a rakish angle makes a statement in any era, I’d take it a step further. Sometimes the hat itself speaks volumes, all by itself, no matter how it sits on someone's head.
Cast your mind back to the Women’s March in Washington, D.C., in January of 2017. The hundreds of thousands of pink knitted or crocheted hats atop the heads of a sea of protestors made an unforgettable sight and sent a clear visual message concerning the marchers' support of human rights, along with their criticism of the newly inaugurated President Trump.
Likewise, a red mesh trucker hat emblazoned with the slogan “Make America Great Again” has become an unmistakable badge of a Trump supporter.
And hats were especially important during the French Revolution, just prior to our Regency era. During that turbulent time a poor unfortunate who wasn’t wearing a hat associated …