Skip to main content

Best-Dressed Imperialist, 18th Century Edition

“To dress up as a man means wearing a suit,” declares fashion consultant Tim Gunn in his Fashion Bible.

That was true seven years ago when Gunn’s book was published in 2012 and it was also true centuries ago when Charles II of England decided that the men who came to his royal court had to follow a particular dress code.

The outfit that the king decreed acceptable in 1666 was the precursor to today’s three-piece suit. He said that a man's apparel had to include a long coat (the ancestor of today's suit jacket) with a waistcoat (today it's called a vest), a cravat (necktie), and of course, knee breeches (pants).

A man's doublet in 1620
That sounds like a no-brainer these days, but earlier in the 17th century before Charles' reign, male fashion included pleated ruffs worn like a ring around the neck and doublets that today look like a woman's blouse. 

But the style of today's suits really started to take shape during the Regency, thanks to the influence of George Bryan Brummell, better known as "Beau" Brummell.   

Brummell was what we'd call a minimalist. He believed that men should avoid bright colors and excessive frills and accessories and instead embrace a pared-down, understated style. 
Beau Brummell

All a man needed to look elegant, according to the Beau, was a pair of trousers, a trim waistcoat topped by a dark jacket and starched white linen shirt and cravat. He was also a proponent of frequent baths and scrupulously clean clothes - something we should all be grateful for.

This style differed markedly from the bright colors and lavish embroidery that was evident in men's clothing before Brummell's influence on the fashion scene. And though it's undergone some modification, the basic style Brummell set in the early 1800s has remained the standard for men's suits ever since. 

But what I also find interesting about clothes is not just their style but also what they reveal about their wearers.

For example, I found a fascinating video produced by the National Museums of Liverpool illustrating how an upper-crust British man got dressed – or rather, was dressed - in the 18th century.

This video shows viewers more than just a man being outfitted in a period costume. Thanks to the skill of the actors, it also vividly portrays how an 18th-century man being dressed by a servant might feel about himself and his privileged place in the world.

As for the hard-working valet, you have to wonder how the servant really felt about his arrogant master. After all, in the time period shown in this video the French Revolution is just around the corner. And we all know how that turned out for the upper classes in France!

1767 portrait of an Englishman
wearing a banyan and cap
What I also find interesting about this clip is that the expensive clothes the man dons signify not only his wealth and social status but also how British imperialism and trade interests seeped into the fashions of the time. 

The garment he lounges in at the beginning of the video is identified both as a “wrapper,”  a Japanese-inspired style, and a “banyan,” an article of clothing based on a gown worn in India.

Today, most men may not have valets to make them feel important, but some men can still afford to use their clothing – say, a $3,000 Italian  Armani suit or a $10,000 Swiss-made Rolex watch - to broadcast a “master of the world” vibe if they wish.

In any event, men's three-piece suits have been with us for some time and will probably to continue to dominate men's fashions. 

As Mark Twain, who was another natty dresser, liked to say, “Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society."

Images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Sources for this post include:


  1. The only thing I like about those clothes is that you get to see what the man's legs look like.

    1. You're right! And some men in those days actually padded their calves (under their stockings) to make their legs appear more shapely.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The end of the Holy Roman Empire, or what happens when the Empire doesn't strike back

This is the way the world ends Not with a bang  but a whimper T.S. Eliot wasn't actually describing the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire when he wrote those words in his poem, “The Hollow Men.” Nonetheless, his words are an extremely apt way to describe the end of the Holy Roman Empire, which ended quietly with a stroke of a pen exactly 212 years ago in August of 1806. That’s when the last emperor decided it was his duty to abdicate, letting the ancient dominion under his protection dissolve rather than allow Napoleon to usurp the role of Holy Roman Emperor and everything that came with it. Francis II, the last Holy Roman Emperor By that August the end of the empire had become inevitable. Napoleon’s victory over Russia and Austria at the Battle of Austerlitz in December of 1805 and his formation of the Confederation of the Rhine the following July (after he convinced 16 German princes to renounce their allegiance to the Holy Roman Empire and join him)

Macaroni Men and Yankee Doodles

The Spirit of '76  (original title Yankee Doodle ) by Archibald Willard, painted in the late 1800s November is a month that here in the United States is defined by food, culminating in a huge Thanksgiving Day feast. It's also the month we honor our military veterans. So I'm going to focus on both food and patriotism - especially an Italian pasta product that became synonymous with a controversial English fashion and developed uniquely American associations. "The Macaroni"- 1773 During the 18th century, it was all the rage for young men of the English nobility to take a trip through Europe to soak up its art and culture. It was called the Grand Tour. In Italy, these privileged lads discovered a pasta dish far removed from their usual British fare. It was called maccaroni , and they raved about it when they got back home. The travelers became known as the Macaroni Club, though there is no evidence an actual club ever existed. But it

The Cato Street Conspiracy

The Cato Street conspirators getting arrested Conspiracy and treason go hand in hand. Throughout history, conspirators have huddled in back rooms and dark corners in secret, concocting schemes that are both dangerous and illegal. So it’s no surprise that their plans often spiral out of control and end in disaster.  A good example of a conspiracy plot gone wrong happened during the Regency. It’s been dubbed the Cato Street Conspiracy because of where the conspirators were caught. This is a tale that, according to historian J.B. Priestley (author of The Prince of Pleasure and his Regency) “begins in absurdity and ends in horror.” The year was 1820. Though the Napoleonic Wars were over, Britain had paid a heavy price for its victory against the French. The costs of the war had strained the country’s economy. The working classes were hit hard by periods of famine, rising food prices due to the Corn Laws, and high unemployment, the latter driven by soldiers returning from th