Skip to main content

Crazy Rich Asians and the Regency



Over the weekend I saw a delightful movie titled Crazy Rich Asians. It’s based on a best-selling book of the same name, by Kevin Kwan.

The story is set in Singapore, and it highlights the culture clash that results when the son of one of the wealthiest Chinese families on the island brings his Chinese-American girlfriend, an independent New Yorker, home to meet his family. 

Naturally, the family member the girlfriend most wants to impress is her boyfriend’s protective, traditionally-minded mother, and the chances of that happening go from low to almost nil.

It’s a fun movie, with terrific acting from the leads, especially the mother, played by Michelle Yeoh. But I think the main star of the show is the island republic that lies just off the tip of the Malay Peninsula in Southeast Asia - Singapore.

And, wouldn’t you know it, Singapore has some significant ties to Regency England.

That’s because the man credited with founding Singapore in 1819, mainly for use as a trading post for the British East India Company, was Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles, a British statesman whose career spanned the Regency era.
Raffles in 1817

Raffles was an able administrator whose influence was felt all over Southeast Asia in the early 19th century. He helped the British Empire expand its holdings in that part of the world, competing against Dutch and French colonial interests.

Specifically, Raffles took part in the British invasion of Java in 1811, and when that war ended he was appointed Lieutenant–Governor of British Java. He also held the post of Governor-General of the Dutch East Indies from 1813 to 1816, and later Governor-General of Bencoolen (a former British colony in present-day Sumatra) from 1818 to 1824.

Still, despite all his work in Indonesia, Raffles was no stranger to the Prince Regent's court in London. He sailed back to England in 1816, stopping along the way at St. Helena to visit Napoleon in exile. 

The following year Raffles was knighted by Prinny. During this time Raffles also developed a close friendship with the Prince’s daughter, Charlotte. In fact, he and his wife named their first child, a girl born in 1818 after they’d left England, Charlotte in honor of the Princess.

Following Raffles' administration, Singapore remained in British hands until the mid-20th century, although it was occupied by the Japanese during World War II. Singapore gained its independence from the UK in 1963, when it joined with other former British colonies to become Malaysia. Two years later, in 1965, it split from Malaysia and became its own sovereign nation.

In Crazy Rich Asians, Singapore’s lush landscape and architectural beauties take center stage. In particular, the Marina Bay Sands, a resort built in 2010, is featured extensively. And rightly so – this place boasts movie theaters, casinos, restaurants, floating pavilions, art and science exhibits, plus the world’s largest atrium casino.

The Marina Bay Sands resort


The resort is striking visually, too. From a distance, the three main towers, designed to resemble a deck of cards, look like they are balancing a giant surfboard on their roofs. But that giant surfboard (which is actually a bridge cantilevered off the northern tower) supports a three-acre park, appropriately named SkyPark, that contains swimming pools, gardens, and even jogging paths.

In addition to all that, SkyPark is apparently a terrific place to throw a party, as shown in the movie.

Singapore's natural beauty—including its coastal areas and tropical flora—is also showcased in the movie. I’m sure Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles would be absolutely amazed if he could see what the patch of jungle he knew 200 years ago has become today.

Here's a glimpse of Crazy Rich Asians:


Comments

  1. Hey Maureen,

    Thanks for showing the trailer for the movie. It does look good!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cato Street Conspiracy

Conspiracy and treason go hand in hand. Throughout history, conspirators have huddled in back rooms and dark corners in secret, concocting schemes that are both dangerous and illegal. So it’s no surprise that their plans often spiral out of control and end in disaster. 
A good example of a conspiracy plot gone wrong happened during the Regency. It’s been dubbed the Cato Street Conspiracy because of where the conspirators were caught. This is a tale that, according to historian J.B. Priestley (author of The Prince of Pleasure and his Regency) “begins in absurdity and ends in horror.”
The year was 1820. Though the Napoleonic Wars were over, Britain had paid a heavy price for its victory against the French. The costs of the war had strained the country’s economy. The working classes were hit hard by periods of famine, rising food prices due to the Corn Laws, and high unemployment, the latter driven by soldiers returning from the battlefields of Europe and looking for work. And of course, t…

The end of the Holy Roman Empire, or what happens when the Empire doesn't strike back

This is the way the world ends Not with a bang but a whimper
T.S. Eliot wasn't actually describing the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire when he wrote those words in his poem, “The Hollow Men.” Nonetheless, his words are an extremely apt way to describe the end of the Holy Roman Empire, which ended quietly with a stroke of a pen exactly 212 years ago in August of 1806. That’s when the last emperor decided it was his duty to abdicate, letting the ancient dominion under his protection dissolve rather than allow Napoleon to usurp the role of Holy Roman Emperor and everything that came with it. By that August the end of the empire had become inevitable. Napoleon’s victory over Russia and Austria at the Battle of Austerlitz in December of 1805 and his formation of the Confederation of the Rhine the following July (after he convinced 16 German princes to renounce their allegiance to the Holy Roman Empire and join him) were fatal blows. Throughout its thousand-year history, the Empire e…

At the drop of a hat: a history of headgear

“Cock your hat – angles are attitudes,” said Frank Sinatra. While I would never disagree with Ol’ Blue Eyes, because I believe that a hat set at a rakish angle makes a statement in any era, I’d take it a step further. Sometimes the hat itself speaks volumes, all by itself, no matter how it sits on someone's head.
Cast your mind back to the Women’s March in Washington, D.C., in January of 2017. The hundreds of thousands of pink knitted or crocheted hats atop the heads of a sea of protestors made an unforgettable sight and sent a clear visual message concerning the marchers' support of human rights, along with their criticism of the newly inaugurated President Trump.
Likewise, a red mesh trucker hat emblazoned with the slogan “Make America Great Again” has become an unmistakable badge of a Trump supporter.
And hats were especially important during the French Revolution, just prior to our Regency era. During that turbulent time a poor unfortunate who wasn’t wearing a hat associated …