Skip to main content

Happy Anniversary to the Queen and Her Prince


A radiant Princess Elizabeth on her wedding day,
with her groom  Philip Mountbatten. 


This week marks the 70th wedding anniversary of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. They’ve joined a rarefied group of human beings who've been married to each other for seven decades. Their Platinum Jubilee represents a remarkable achievement and one that’s unmatched in the history of the British monarchy.

The royal pair married on November 20, 1947, in the first “wedding of the century.” (Almost 34 years later their son, Prince Charles, would wed Lady Diana Spencer in a ceremony that was also dubbed “the wedding of the century.”) World War II had just ended, and Elizabeth and her sister Margaret used rationing coupons to buy the fabric for the bride’s pretty wedding gown.

That was a lifetime ago, before most of the world’s current population was even born. Since those two tied the knot in Westminster Abbey, astronauts have landed on the moon, the United States expanded by two states, and the use of personal computers and cell phones (both devices unheard of in 1947) has spread to every corner of the world. 

And that’s just a tiny sample of the events and accomplishments the world has witnessed over the past 70 years, along with (unfortunately) more wars, global environmental and economic stress, and anxiety over international and domestic terrorism, no matter where you live.  

In the face of such change and turmoil, it’s comforting and even astonishing to see such a solid and enduring union in Buckingham Palace. Only one royal couple has even come close to the Queen and Philip’s marital record, and that was a marriage that took place 186 years before the Queen's 1947 ceremony (more on that subject in this week's Friday Follies).

Prinny, the Prince Regent, had one of the most dismal marital records; his marriage to Caroline of Brunswick in 1795 barely lasted long enough for the two of them to conceive one child. The birth of their daughter Charlotte was followed by many bitter years of recrimination and separation until Caroline died in 1821.

A miniature of the future Prince Regent
and King George IV in 1792 


You could argue that even King Henry VIII, with his many wives, divorces and wifely beheadings, enjoyed more periods (though brief) of marital harmony than our Prince Regent.

But they are a few factors, besides its longevity, that sets the union of Elizabeth and Philip apart from those of their royal predecessors.

One is that it was clearly a love match – the 13-year-old princess was apparently smitten by her handsome cousin when she first met him, and over the following years she couldn’t get her future husband out of her mind. That sort of attraction isn't common among royal couples, especially for monarchs of the past who married for dynastic reasons.

And what I think is even more important, it looks as though the Queen and her Prince Consort have forged a good, working partnership over their many years together, and that they still enjoy each other’s company. I know she probably has more important things to do, but I’d be interested in any book the Queen cared to write offering advice to newlyweds on the secrets of a long-lasting, happy marriage.

On the balcony of Buckingham Palace in June 2012
(Photo by Carfax 2, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0)


Unfortunately, the four children of Prince Philip and the Queen haven’t followed in their parents’ footsteps. Here’s a quick run-down of their marriages and divorces:

Charles, Prince of Wales. His fairy-tale marriage to Lady Diana Spencer in 1981 produced two sons but ended in a spectacular divorce in 1996, followed by the tragic death of his ex-wife a year later. Charles rebounded by marrying his long-time mistress Camilla Parker Bowles in 2005, and their union is at 12 years and counting.

Anne, Princess Royal. She divorced her first husband Mark Phillips, with whom she had a son and daughter, in 1992 after almost 20 years of marriage. She remarried the same year, to Timothy Laurence. That union seems to be hitting its stride – they will celebrate their 25th wedding anniversary next month.

Prince Andrew, Duke of York. He also had a highly-publicized marriage, in 1986 to Sarah Ferguson. That marriage, which produced two daughters, didn’t quite make it to the 10-year mark, though Andrew and his ex-wife appear to have remained on good terms following their split.

Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex. The Queen’s youngest seems to be learning from his siblings' marital missteps and is still married to the lovely Sophie, whom he wed in 1999. Their marriage appears to be a happy one, and they also have a son and a daughter.

So, if you’re keeping score, from their four children Elizabeth and Philip got eight grandchildren but also a few former sons-and daughters-in-law to keep track of. They’ve also been blessed with four great-grandchildren, including little Prince George and Princess Charlotte of Cambridge, and there's another Cambridge baby on the way.

Clearly, the legacy of the Queen's long marriage is the family it’s produced. Like all married couples, Elizabeth and Philip have had their marital ups and downs, no doubt complicated by being under the steady gaze of the public eye. (If you’re interested in a fictionalized account of the love lives of Elizabeth and her sister Margaret, catch the popular Netflix series, The Crown, which will air its second season on December 8.) 


So, here’s toast to Elizabeth and Philip! And as a further tribute I've attached a video clip of their wedding ceremony, held 70 years ago this week:



Images from Wikimedia Commons

Comments

  1. They are quite a couple, I agree! They are a fine example to everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know, right! Being married 70 years is astonishing. Thanks for your comment!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cato Street Conspiracy

Conspiracy and treason go hand in hand. Throughout history, conspirators have huddled in back rooms and dark corners in secret, concocting schemes that are both dangerous and illegal. So it’s no surprise that their plans often spiral out of control and end in disaster. 
A good example of a conspiracy plot gone wrong happened during the Regency. It’s been dubbed the Cato Street Conspiracy because of where the conspirators were caught. This is a tale that, according to historian J.B. Priestley (author of The Prince of Pleasure and his Regency) “begins in absurdity and ends in horror.”
The year was 1820. Though the Napoleonic Wars were over, Britain had paid a heavy price for its victory against the French. The costs of the war had strained the country’s economy. The working classes were hit hard by periods of famine, rising food prices due to the Corn Laws, and high unemployment, the latter driven by soldiers returning from the battlefields of Europe and looking for work. And of course, t…

The end of the Holy Roman Empire, or what happens when the Empire doesn't strike back

This is the way the world ends Not with a bang but a whimper
T.S. Eliot wasn't actually describing the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire when he wrote those words in his poem, “The Hollow Men.” Nonetheless, his words are an extremely apt way to describe the end of the Holy Roman Empire, which ended quietly with a stroke of a pen exactly 212 years ago in August of 1806. That’s when the last emperor decided it was his duty to abdicate, letting the ancient dominion under his protection dissolve rather than allow Napoleon to usurp the role of Holy Roman Emperor and everything that came with it. By that August the end of the empire had become inevitable. Napoleon’s victory over Russia and Austria at the Battle of Austerlitz in December of 1805 and his formation of the Confederation of the Rhine the following July (after he convinced 16 German princes to renounce their allegiance to the Holy Roman Empire and join him) were fatal blows. Throughout its thousand-year history, the Empire e…

At the drop of a hat: a history of headgear

“Cock your hat – angles are attitudes,” said Frank Sinatra. While I would never disagree with Ol’ Blue Eyes, because I believe that a hat set at a rakish angle makes a statement in any era, I’d take it a step further. Sometimes the hat itself speaks volumes, all by itself, no matter how it sits on someone's head.
Cast your mind back to the Women’s March in Washington, D.C., in January of 2017. The hundreds of thousands of pink knitted or crocheted hats atop the heads of a sea of protestors made an unforgettable sight and sent a clear visual message concerning the marchers' support of human rights, along with their criticism of the newly inaugurated President Trump.
Likewise, a red mesh trucker hat emblazoned with the slogan “Make America Great Again” has become an unmistakable badge of a Trump supporter.
And hats were especially important during the French Revolution, just prior to our Regency era. During that turbulent time a poor unfortunate who wasn’t wearing a hat associated …