Skip to main content

Regency witches



Along with jack o’ lanterns and black cats, witches are iconic images of our contemporary Halloween celebrations. But during the Regency, witches weren’t the comfortable and familiar holiday symbols that they are to us today. The history behind witches was too recent and too gruesome for that, and people living in England during the Regency would have been very aware of that history.

According to historian Suzannah Lipscomb, about 100,000 people across Europe were accused of witchcraft in the three centuries between 1482 and 1782, with an estimated 40,000 to 60,000 executed. Although the majority of the accused were women, they weren’t the only ones put to death for the crime of witchcraft - about a quarter of the victims were men.

In case you’re wondering, in America during the 1692-93 witch trials in the Salem, Massachusetts colony 20 suspected witches (14 of them women) were executed, all but one by hanging. (The unlucky exception was a man who was “pressed to death” by heavy planks and boulders.) Five other Salem suspects died in jail. And during the witch craze in America, there were victims in other areas, not just in Salem. 

The British Isles also had its share of witch trials during this period. A famous one took place in North Berwick, Scotland and involved the Scottish monarch, King James VI. (After England and Scotland unified in 1603 he became King James I of England and Ireland.)


The accused witches of North Berwick kneeling before King James,
illustration from Daemonologie

King James believed that a coven of witches had deliberately stirred up storms in the Firth of Forth as an assassination attempt on him and his wife, and also to disrupt shipping. One poor woman was tortured till she was confessed that she was in league with the devil and did indeed conspire against the king. She was garroted and burned in 1591.

As a result of his personal interest in witchcraft, in 1597 King James wrote Daemonologie, a text that Shakespeare used as a source when writing Macbeth.



King James VI and I,
attributed to John de Critz, circa 1605

Laws criminalizing witchcraft were passed and there were more incidents in Britain, many during the 17th century. In 1621 there was a sensational case in Lancashire centering on the members of two families living in Pendle who were accused of practicing witchcraft. Along with the “Pendle witches" another group known as the “Samlesbury witches” were also tried, though they later acquitted. 

Following the trials, two men and eight women were hanged in Lancaster. The victims probably would have been joined by another family member, an 80-year-old woman, if she hadn’t died in prison awaiting her trial.

And back in Scotland, in 1697 six people were hanged and burned on the word of an 11-year-old girl, ironically named Christian Shaw. There would have been seven executions resulting from her lies if one of the accused hadn’t committed suicide in jail.

Queen Anne, by Michael Dahl, 1705


This madness came to an official end in 1712 when Queen Anne pardoned Jane Wenham, the last woman in England convicted of witchcraft.  My favorite part of that trial was Judge John Powell’s response to a witness who claimed that one of the demonic powers of the accused was the ability to fly through the air.

The judge noted dryly that there was no law against flying. 

Jane was still convicted. But following the Queen’s pardon, she was able to peacefully live out the rest of her life, until her death in 1730.

So, people were no longer executed for witchcraft after Queen Anne's intercession, and the Parliamentary Acts regarding witchcraft were repealed in 1736.

However, that doesn’t mean everyone stopped believing in witches.

That’s something Ann Izzard, who lived in Cambridgeshire in 1808 in the village of Great Paxton, found out the hard way. Her fellow villagers began to suspect her of practicing witchcraft when things started to go wrong in their lives. The “evidence” included fits and bouts of depression among some local young women. And a man on his way home from the market claimed he saw his cart magically overturn.

Clearly, there was a witch at work, or so the villagers believed, and the bony finger of suspicion was pointed at Ann.

A 1579 illustration of an English witch feeding her animal "familiars"


On a Sunday evening in early May, a mob gathered outside the cottage where Ann and her husband lived. They broke into her house and dragged her outside, partially naked, where she was clubbed in her face and stomach. Other members of the mob scratched her hard to make her bleed, in an attempt to get the witchcraft out of her body.

But the abuse didn’t stop there. The next day, the villagers turned their attention to a neighbor, a widow accused of harboring Ann. Finally, when rumors began to surface that Ann was about to be “swum” to determine for sure if she was a witch,  Ann decided to get the heck out of town.

(“Swimming” was one of many tests used on suspected witches. Like similar tests, it was a lose-lose proposition for the unfortunate accused. The test involved tying up a suspected witch, hand-to-foot, and throwing him or her in the water. Sinking and drowning was proof of innocence. Floating was proof of guilt, in which case execution was the likely result. As you can see, there was no good outcome for the unwilling takers of this test.)

If you overlook the beating she took, Ann’s story doesn’t end too badly. Once she was away from her charming village, she brought charges against her persecutors. At the next assizes or local court session, nine villagers were prosecuted for what they did to her.

Now Ann’s story took place well after the so-called period of Enlightenment in Europe when rational ideas were supposed to replace superstitious beliefs. And yet the people in her village were just as convinced as their medieval ancestors that witches were real and powerful – and hence, it was okay to torture and /or kill them.

So this holiday, when you see cute paper cut-outs of witches or children wearing pointy black hats and carrying brooms, it’s important to remember that those are more than just fun symbols. They are reminders of a shameful time in history, when superstition, fear, and mob psychology made people do terrible things to innocent victims.

I wish the witchcraft hysteria of centuries past was a unique example of man’s inhumanity to man. But alas, it’s not even close to being the sole instance of institutionalized cruelty, nor is it likely to be the last.


And that’s a truly terrifying thought for Halloween, scarier than any ghost or goblin. 





Resources for this post include:

Images courtesy of Pixabay and Wikimedia Commons

Comments

  1. We are currently in a shameful time in history where the mob psychology is making us behave very badly toward our fellow Americans, and other fellow human beings. I am ashamed of us. It's too bad more people haven't learned from this cruelty. It seems like a battle we will always have to fight.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree whole-heartedly! You'd hope we'd learn from the past, not repeat it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cato Street Conspiracy

Conspiracy and treason go hand in hand. Throughout history, conspirators have huddled in back rooms and dark corners in secret, concocting schemes that are both dangerous and illegal. So it’s no surprise that their plans often spiral out of control and end in disaster. 
A good example of a conspiracy plot gone wrong happened during the Regency. It’s been dubbed the Cato Street Conspiracy because of where the conspirators were caught. This is a tale that, according to historian J.B. Priestley (author of The Prince of Pleasure and his Regency) “begins in absurdity and ends in horror.”
The year was 1820. Though the Napoleonic Wars were over, Britain had paid a heavy price for its victory against the French. The costs of the war had strained the country’s economy. The working classes were hit hard by periods of famine, rising food prices due to the Corn Laws, and high unemployment, the latter driven by soldiers returning from the battlefields of Europe and looking for work. And of course, t…

The end of the Holy Roman Empire, or what happens when the Empire doesn't strike back

This is the way the world ends Not with a bang but a whimper
T.S. Eliot wasn't actually describing the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire when he wrote those words in his poem, “The Hollow Men.” Nonetheless, his words are an extremely apt way to describe the end of the Holy Roman Empire, which ended quietly with a stroke of a pen exactly 212 years ago in August of 1806. That’s when the last emperor decided it was his duty to abdicate, letting the ancient dominion under his protection dissolve rather than allow Napoleon to usurp the role of Holy Roman Emperor and everything that came with it. By that August the end of the empire had become inevitable. Napoleon’s victory over Russia and Austria at the Battle of Austerlitz in December of 1805 and his formation of the Confederation of the Rhine the following July (after he convinced 16 German princes to renounce their allegiance to the Holy Roman Empire and join him) were fatal blows. Throughout its thousand-year history, the Empire e…

At the drop of a hat: a history of headgear

“Cock your hat – angles are attitudes,” said Frank Sinatra. While I would never disagree with Ol’ Blue Eyes, because I believe that a hat set at a rakish angle makes a statement in any era, I’d take it a step further. Sometimes the hat itself speaks volumes, all by itself, no matter how it sits on someone's head.
Cast your mind back to the Women’s March in Washington, D.C., in January of 2017. The hundreds of thousands of pink knitted or crocheted hats atop the heads of a sea of protestors made an unforgettable sight and sent a clear visual message concerning the marchers' support of human rights, along with their criticism of the newly inaugurated President Trump.
Likewise, a red mesh trucker hat emblazoned with the slogan “Make America Great Again” has become an unmistakable badge of a Trump supporter.
And hats were especially important during the French Revolution, just prior to our Regency era. During that turbulent time a poor unfortunate who wasn’t wearing a hat associated …